🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where Black people are compensated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Originally observed in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since those days, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.